Re: The Pointlessness of the MD5 "attacks"

["James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

    --
On 15 Dec 2004 at 8:51, Ben Laurie wrote:
> People seem to be having a hard time grasping what I'm trying
> to say, so perhaps I should phrase it as a challenge: find me
> a scenario where you can use an MD5 collision to mount an
> attack in which I could not mount an equally effective attack
> without using an MD5 collision.

I could circulate watermarked versions of copyrighted material
without it being apparent that they were watermarked. 

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     brRAUUDlwL/ZhPKf51gh0pzlr6ISDbBPNAbnzJfI
     41Hx46udB9H+g9Lkm68G20fQMC+F6YzLxJhmwuZu4


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]