Re: SSL/TLS passive sniffing

[John Denker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

Florian Weimer wrote:

> Would you recommend to switch to /dev/urandom (which doesn't block if
> the entropy estimate for the in-kernel pool reaches 0), and stick to
> generating new DH parameters for each connection, 

No, I wouldn't.

> or ...
> generate them once per day and use it for several connections?

I wouldn't do that, either.




If the problem is a shortage of random bits, get more random bits!

Almost every computer sold on the mass market these days has a sound
system built in. That can be used to generate industrial-strength
randomness at rates more than sufficient for the applications we're
talking about.  (And if you can afford to buy a non-mass-market
machine, you can afford to plug a sound-card into it.)

For a discussion of the principles of how to get arbitrarily close
to 100% entropy density, plus working code, see:
  http://www.av8n.com/turbid/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]