|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Dailydave] Faster, smashter. |  |
- To: Dave Aitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: Re: [Dailydave] Faster, smashter.
- From: Halvar Flake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:21:33 +0100
- Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 |
| |
Hey all,
> One technique we're doing this week with a client is taking an attack
> tree and marking it up with dollar values. I.E. if you wanted to buy
> an 0day in X component, how much would it cost?
>
> This then is a simple summation to produce a "how much is it to get
> into the internal network from the internet" which the business can
> use to help them decide yay/nay on the project as a whole depending on
> their own view of the threat and the value of the information they are
> protecting.
Sounds quite reasonable. It's also one of the pro arguments for having
(public)
vulnerability markets: They provide planners with price information for
attack
tools, and thus allow more informed decisions.
Cheers,
Halvar
PS: I am not advocating unrestricted OTC vulnerability trading with this,
just pointing out that having pricing information publically available
is very
useful for planners
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
| |