|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Dailydave] XSS=10000 |  |
- To: Rauc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: Re: [Dailydave] XSS=10000
- From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:32:09 -0700
- Cc: dailydave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 |
| |
Rauc wrote:
>> I have to admit this is in the top 10 "hacking contest" fails of all
>> time.
>
> I am not sure that this is really a fail. For only $10k, he managed to
> get a penetration test that involved numbers of hackers. Sure the
> product failed to stand up, (Due to a really stupid bug) but the bug was
> found, and now it can be fixed.
>
> We have seen that the world is willing to put up with claims of software
> being secure, even when it is not. Oracle's 'Unbreakable', Windows NT
> was 'Unstoppable', and a host of others.
>
> Business executives will still choose a product such as this so called
> Strongmail, if it is marketed well. Additionally, if this company can
> show that it learns from it's mistakes, as Microsoft had for a time,
> they will be even better off.
Nobody is going to buy this webmail thing. That's not the company's
goal. The webmail app is a trojan to show off their phone authentication
service, which is what they are really trying to sell.
--
Nate
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
| |