|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
ISP reacts against Lovsan (alias: MSBlast, Poza, Blaster, W32/Msblast, Lovesun) WAS: RE: [Dshield] DCOM morning after |  |
- Subject: ISP reacts against Lovsan (alias: MSBlast, Poza, Blaster, W32/Msblast, Lovesun) WAS: RE: [Dshield] DCOM morning after
- From: peter.stendahl-juvonen at welho.com (Peter Stendahl-Juvonen)
- Date: Wed Aug 13 08:24:48 2003
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 |
| |
RE: ISP reacts against Lovsan (alias: MSBlast, Poza, Blaster,
W32/Msblast, Lovesun) WAS: RE: [Dshield] DCOM morning after
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:17 AM: on behalf of: Craig Shaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig,
Right you are.
| -snip-
| Still, if they were blocking internal traffic but leaving the outside
| stuff still wide open, I would expect you to still see a lot of
| traffic on your firewall.
| -snip-
1) Traffic on firewall (during an eleven hrs period after ISP's
"internal traffic" filtering applied) show:
120 hits targeted to port 135 (Service: RPC Remote Procedure Call,
Transport: TCP (flags:S)).
11 hits targeted to port 445 (Service: MSFT DS, SMB Server Message
Block, Transport: TCP (flags:S)).
6 hits targeted to port 139 (NETBIOS Session Service, Transport: TCP
(flags:S)).
2) Not a single one hit attempt originates from other subscribers of
this same ISP.
(Number of subscribers several tens of thousands.)
When ISP applies this kind of filtering, fellow [ISP] subscribers no
longer reported to DShield in my logs. ;=)
Thanks again
Pete
"Ask a question and you are a fool for one minute.
Don't ask a question and you are a fool forever."
Chinese Proverb.
| |