Virus.Org  IT Security News and Information Portal. We offer the latest IT security news, updates, product reviews, books, and articles for all you IT security professionals out there. Enter and get the best IT security information on the Internet.

 

. Welcome to the Virus.Org Mailing List Archive  
.
.


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Re: [Dshield] Message posting formatting request
.

  • To: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Subject: Re: [Dshield] Message posting formatting request
  • From: Alan Frayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Date: 01 Oct 2003 08:01:36 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Old-x-envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Reply-to: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
 
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 01:40, Neil Richardson wrote:
> /me steps up to the microphone: "Um....hi.

Hi!

[snip]

> I have noticed lately (the past few weeks) that when someone posts a
> long message to the list, there are quite a number of people who will
> reply to the message in it's entirety and pre-pend only one or two
> lines of text.  Within a day or two, the reply has the message quoted
> 5 levels deep--with 5 different copies of the "To change your
> subscription options (or unsubscribe), see:
> http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/list"; signature appended.

And shame on us, regardless of how busy we are, to not edit our quoting
(being serious, we really should edit more).

> If the new text were "post-pended", things would become annoying very
> very quickly.  ("Scroll-scroll-scroll-scroll-delete.  Scroll-delete.
> Scroll-scroll-scroll-scroll-scroll-scroll-scroll-delete.")  With it at
> the top, reading "untrimmed" messages isn't such a big deal--but the
> annoyance is compounded if you're trying to read your mail via a
> wireless connection, in which case having to download a 7KB message to
> read 2 new sentences and a URL becomes very unpleasant.

I can imagine how wireless might be worse, but then, I don't think I
would send a mail list, with potentially large numbers of mail pieces
(and possibly large pieces, themselves), to a wireless e-mail address.

I just finished a lengthy debate on top posting vs bottom posting, and
the bottom posters won there, so I'm forming the habit of following
suit.

[snip]

> Am I on to something?  (Comments welcome.)  Or am I completely out of
> line?  (Please reply off-list so the thread will die faster.  :-)

The moderators will set the rule, I'm sure, but I'm in favor of
significant editing and inline commenting, when possible.

________________________________________________________________________
Alan Frayer,CNE,CNI,CIW CI,MCP,Net+ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seeking an IT Mgmt/Network Admin position in the Tampa Bay Region
If you would like to discuss an opportunity with me, please e-mail.


_______________________________________________
list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see: http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/list

 
.
.
 
Copyright (c) Virus.Org 1997-2006.
All Trademarks Acknowledged.
Please view our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.