|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Dshield] Economic statistics |  |
- To: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: Re: [Dshield] Economic statistics
- From: Keith Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:10:21 -0400
- Old-x-envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Reply-to: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
| |
---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:54:46 -0700
>From: John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Dshield] Economic statistics
>To: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 12:23,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >the difference between a virus and a worm lies
>> >with the mode of replication, does it not? I once
>> >had this down pat, but lack of discussion has
>> >made my memory foggy.
>>
>> Actually, I believe that, technically, worms are a subset
of viruses (i.e.
>> all worms are also viruses, but not all viruses are worms).
>
>Huh? Since when do worms spread by infecting other programs?
>
>> The defining characteristic of a worm, as opposed to other
types of
>> viruses, is that a worm does not require any human action
to
>> spread....
>
>Really? Lots of viruses spread without human interaction.
>
>How about this:
>
>A virus is program code that spreads by attaching itself to
other,
>legitimate program or document files. It must have write
access to files
>in order to spread. If those programs or documents are
transmitted to
>other computers, or are on shared storage, it will be able
to spread to
>other computers when the infected file is accessed. This may
or may not
>require user action depending on the nature of the infected
file
>(consider, for example, an infected file that is called from
your
>network-wide user login script).
>
>A worm is program code that spreads by directly attacking
remote
>systems, either through a flaw in a network service that
allows the worm
>to inject its code into the new system, or through a flaw in
some user
>tool that a user uses to process the file when it's
received. This
>divides worms into two categories: autonomous, which
directly attack
>publicly visible system services without human intervention,
and ... uh
>... (somebody suggest a better name than non-autonomous)
that require
>the user to interact (if only to the extent of starting
Outlook to
>retrieve messages).
>
>Perhaps: viruses attack files, worms attack services?
I agree with these. I offer up another definition to simplify.
A worm is a virus that will propagate by itself, or without
user interaction.
MBlaster worm attached automatically to a vulnerable
computer, and then used that computer to start attacking
others. The user of the computer never saw anything.
A virus is spread by somebody reading an infected email, or
going to an infected web page, or running a program of some
sort.
Keith.
_______________________________________________
list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see: http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/list
 |
| |