|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Dshield] Message posting formatting request |  |
- To: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: Re: [Dshield] Message posting formatting request
- From: Neil Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 00:17:36 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Old-x-envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 10:15 AM 10/1/2003, you wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 05:01, Alan Frayer wrote:
>
>> I just finished a lengthy debate on top posting vs bottom posting,
[snip]
>This is a decades-old issue.
I should know better than to e-mail while tired. I brought up the
top-vs-bottom posting bit only as a convenient way to also mention
that some people might be checking their accounts via wireless (I'd
recently read something about people using Blackberry devices to do
that, so it was fresh in my mind). Obviously people wouldn't be using
(this type of) wireless as the primary way to get their mail, but if
they have to travel between sites or wait a few minutes before a
meeting or something and want to knock a few messages off, then it
becomes harder if that message is pages and pages long. That's why I
bring it up at all.
My apologies if it seemed like I was trying to restart the Holy Wars
Of Quoting, that wasn't my intent.
- -Neil R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj970QoACgkQKmyYs0c8RZ+85QCgli1DuDNkFN1lj6b65cZR5gPy
digAoLjK9peuFzGz4AvlCyfPwI6Uzzsm
=NZG3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see: http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/list
| |