|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Dshield] Request for Information re: Linksys Router Loggingand Dshield Submissions |  |
- To: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: [Dshield] Request for Information re: Linksys Router Loggingand Dshield Submissions
- From: John Holmblad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:24:40 -0400
- Cc:
- Old-x-envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Organization: Televerage International
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: General DShield Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam,
that is why I copied Linksys on the email, hoping, despite past
unsatisfying interactions with their customer care organization, that
someone there would take the time to look into this "feature" defect in
the chain of systems that starts with the BEFSX41 and ends with the
DShield service. So far I have gotten a form type email response from
them but no substance. Also it occurred to me that there might be one or
more CVTWIN knowledgeable individuals and maybe even some Linksys
employees who are on this list and who care enough about this to help
clarify what is going on.
What I would really like to achieve is a solution where a) the incoming
filter is enabled on the BEFSX41 to provide my network stronger
protection, and b) DShield still gets the counts of such filtered
packets. The workaround solution of "falling back" to the protection
provided by NAT/PAT is just that, and, in my opinion, not the best solution.
--
Best Regards,
John Holmblad
Televerage International
(H) 703 620 0672
(M) 703 407 2278
(F) 703 620 5388
www page: www.vtext.com/users/jholmblad
primary email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
backup email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
text email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your subscription options (or unsubscribe), see: http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/list
| |