![]() |
|
|
|
[please use the discussion list or off-list email to reply] From time to time, I am getting requests from researchers for access to DShield data. While DShield data, with the exception of data that could be used to identify submitters, is essentially "public", it has been very time consuming to fulfill these requests. On the other hand, I think it would be a waste not to share the data we collect more widely. For example, I have pointed to Vinod's papers in the past, which have been very useful. In particular to look at historic data more comprehensively, I would like to solicit some outside help. In order to help with this, I would like to start a discussion about how to accomplish this best. I would like to establish a 'DShield/ISC Research Feed'. Interested researchers can use this feed for their research. In order to reduce load on our systems, I would hope that one participant will establish a 'proxy', which others can use to pull the data from. A couple of objectives: - The feed should provide as much information as possible, without revealing submitter information. I would suggest that the target IP is encrypted (e.g. some form of md5hash). This way, the recipient will still be able to count distinct targets, which is an important number. - Same for the userid: if the userid is included at all, it is encrypted. Again, it is very useful to see if suspicious data is submitted by a particular user, or to observe how data for a particular user changed over time. - All the other data would be sent 'as is'. If there are any objections to this approach, please note so on our public discussion list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) If you are interested in this research feed, or if you would like to provide resources for it, please contact me off list. DShield data will be made available free of charge for non-commercial research. All results have to be made available to the public and DShield or the Internet Storm Center have to be credited for the data. If some research is particularly resource intensive, it may be appropriate to contribute respective resources (hardware, time, bandwidth) to the project. As resources for this are limited, there may be a selection based on the merit of the proposed analysis. I hope to establish a group of reviewers if this should become necessary (at this point, its the 'squeeky wheel' principle...) -- CTO SANS Internet Storm Center http://isc.sans.org phone: (617) 837 2807 [EMAIL PROTECTED] contact details: http://johannes.homepc.org/contact.htm Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Dshieldannounce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/dshieldannounce
|