|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[fw-wiz] Needed open ports other than 1723 for MS VPN? |  |
- Subject: [fw-wiz] Needed open ports other than 1723 for MS VPN?
- From: Behm, Jeffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:25:45 -0600
 |
| |
If it's PPTP only then I believe you would also need the GRE protocol. If
it's IPSec then there are other things as well. PPTP only? or IPSec as well?
You DON'T need the 137-139 crap...
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 01 10:36 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [fw-wiz] Needed open ports other than 1723 for MS VPN?
>
>
>Just a quick simple question for most of you here I am sure.
>In trying to
>allow as minimal amount of port openings being exposed. In
>doing so I am
>running into a few probloms while having others attempt to VPN
>into my main
>server. I have opened 1723 to allow incoming traffic to the
>server but still
>am experiencing problems allowing the clients to reach my
>network. Are there
>any loopback ports (or any at all) required other than 1723 to
>complete a
>VPN connection. I am hoping that I don't receive a response
>that 135 and 139
>need to be opened up but if that's what it takes so be it. Thanks in
>advance!!
>
>_______________________________________________
>firewall-wizards mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
 |
| |