Virus.Org  IT Security News and Information Portal. We offer the latest IT security news, updates, product reviews, books, and articles for all you IT security professionals out there. Enter and get the best IT security information on the Internet.

 

. Welcome to the Virus.Org Mailing List Archive  
.
.


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


[fw-wiz] Needed open ports other than 1723 for MS VPN?
.

  • Subject: [fw-wiz] Needed open ports other than 1723 for MS VPN?
  • From: Behm, Jeffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:25:45 -0600
.
 
If it's PPTP only then I believe you would also need the GRE protocol. If
it's IPSec then there are other things as well. PPTP only? or IPSec as well?

You DON'T need the 137-139 crap...

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 01 10:36 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [fw-wiz] Needed open ports other than 1723 for MS VPN?
>
>
>Just a quick simple question for most of you here I am sure. 
>In trying to
>allow as minimal amount of port openings being exposed. In 
>doing so I am
>running into a few probloms while having others attempt to VPN 
>into my main
>server. I have opened 1723 to allow incoming traffic to the 
>server but still
>am experiencing problems allowing the clients to reach my 
>network. Are there
>any loopback ports (or any at all) required other than 1723 to 
>complete a
>VPN connection. I am hoping that I don't receive a response 
>that 135 and 139
>need to be opened up but if that's what it takes so be it. Thanks in
>advance!!
>
>_______________________________________________
>firewall-wizards mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>






 
.
.
 
Copyright (c) Virus.Org 1997-2006.
All Trademarks Acknowledged.
Please view our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.