Re: Numberd int reqd for arpd?

[Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

Clarification... "numbered" as in with IP assigned.

Sorry about the delay...

Earl

--- Kyle Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:56:02 -0700 (PDT), Earl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
> > Subject says it... Does arpd really require a
> > "numbered" interface to work?
> > 
> > With an unnumbered interface I get:
> > arpd: bad interface configuration: not IP or
> Ethernet
> > 
> > If I number it, all's well.
> 
> One would think that it would be required: without
> the number, there's
> no interface by that name. This is OS-dependent, I
> think, since with
> some Solaris tools you can specify the driver type
> (e.g. "hme", not
> necessarily "hme0" or "hme1"). But in Linux I
> haven't noticed a tool
> that worked this way.
> 
> -- 
> Kyle Maxwell
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com