|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: (pacsec bonus) Re: VMWare Detection? |  |
- To: Lance Spitzner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: Re: (pacsec bonus) Re: VMWare Detection?
- From: Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:15:44 -0600
- Cc: Kurt Seifried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=eyBa0T0Y59Ukv5a7mPD1SIvByye7DA1ZDeWRZ0PCBafme9IzmQt4uD7UeOAkWWLe+H2WNvMnlkOna+BF3e1mb7KmxbwYyqz0CWWOGA9Wo4Xv0573msnw5wxd1wr7dKWoyA5pp2tnmBFimPjPK/0nJy+Pcc1nUiOKRv9jK+CpL4U=
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 |
| |
Comments in-line
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:36:04 -0600, Lance Spitzner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lots of great discussions and tools demonstrated on detecting the use
> of VMware. Some pondering, if I may.
>
> - In reference to honeypots, is the detection of VMware a bad thing?
> Okay, the attacker gains access and identifies the system is using
> VMware. Lots of legitimate organizations use VMware, the economics of
> virtualization can be a big motivator. In fact, this will potentially
> grow. So, I would contend that the detection of VMware does not
> automatically mean honeypot.
Perfectly true! In fact none of our VMWare [production!] machines are
honeypots - honeypots are everything BUT virtualized environments of
any sort. By the way - if not willing or - even worse - not paying
attention to changing them - the MAC addresses would betray VMWare,
also ;)
( http://www.giac.org/practical/GCIA/Dana_Webber_GCIA.pdf and
http://tinyurl.com/566lw )
> - If an attacker does detect VMware, and assume its a honeypot and
> leaves the system, does this mean that VMware is potentially more
> secure for production systems?
>
If that would be true, then I would really move all my servers to VMWare ...
> - If attackers or automated threats do begin running automated
> detection mechanisms for VMware, would it not then be possible to put
> those very same signatures into legitimate systems, so threats now
> avoid them?
>
Yes!!! ... or at least I hope so (see previous point) ...
> I'm not attempting to downplay the detection issue, but just some
> random thoughts.
>
> lance
All very good points, Lance, and the more so that people - for
whatever reasons - seem to equate VMWare with HONeypot (VMW = HON :))
Stef
>
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2004, at 16:35, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>
> > Computer BIOS
> > One way to identify VMware systems is by their BIOS, there are a
> > number of free windows utilities that can query the BIOS for
> > information and even extract a copy of the BIOS from the VMware
> > system. The good news is that from within Windows NT/2000 you cannot
> > easily access the BIOS and send commands as direct access to the
> > hardware is blocked. You can however easily query the BIOS for
> > information from within the guest operating system you will be given
> > the following information:
>
>
| |