|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: (pacsec bonus) Re: VMWare Detection? |  |
- To: Lance Spitzner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: (pacsec bonus) Re: VMWare Detection?
- From: MrDemeanour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:59:53 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lance Spitzner wrote:
Lots of great discussions and tools demonstrated on detecting the use
of VMware. Some pondering, if I may.
- In reference to honeypots, is the detection of VMware a bad thing?
Okay, the attacker gains access and identifies the system is using
VMware. Lots of legitimate organizations use VMware, the economics
of virtualization can be a big motivator. In fact, this will
potentially grow. So, I would contend that the detection of VMware
does not automatically mean honeypot.
Indeed. My employer is a software manufacturer; our sales teams use
VMWare extensively.
* Snapshot facility allows them instantly to restore a demo system to a
known state.
* Demos of pre-release product can be configured once and distributed to
the field as a working system that will work on any VMWare-equipped
notebook.
* Notebooks used for demos can also be used for production work
(business email, document preparation etc.) without risking
de-stabilising the demo system, by switching to a production
partition.
* Our software is server software. If it is necessary to demonstrate the
software as distinct client and server systems, this can be done on a
single notebook computer.
I'm also informed that VMWare does a *much* better job of memory
management than Windows does. If you are running a large Java VM,
consuming (say) half a gig of memory, as well as a RDBMS and other
special services, it is apparently advantageous to use VMWare to divide
the system in two. I haven't tried this, so I don't know what
partitioning scheme works best.
VMWare wasn't invented for honeypot operators. On the contrary, I'd
expect honeypot operators to be very much in the minority of VMWare users.
- If an attacker does detect VMware, and assume its a honeypot and
leaves the system, does this mean that VMware is potentially more
secure for production systems?
I'd say that *potentially* VMWare is more secure anyway, if for no
other reason than the fact that it can be instantly restored to a known
configuration.
--
Jack.
| |