|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: (pacsec bonus) Re: VMWare Detection? |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: RE: (pacsec bonus) Re: VMWare Detection?
- From: "M. Shirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:25:53 -0500
It would be upsetting if the next ScanOfTheMonth had a binary with this
capability. No one could get the malware to execute because it would
shutdown after detecting the VMWare environment. :-)
Shirkdog
http://www.shirkdog.us
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (pacsec bonus) Re: VMWare Detection?
Importance: Low
A little off the honeypot topic, but wouldn't the bigger problem with
VMWare detection be to those of us doing Malware analysis? I almost
exclusively use a laptop system with multiple VMWare Guests running to
analyze a suspect piece of Malware. I have found some workarounds to VMWare
detections (i.e the code looks for VMWare tools, so delete it...it looks for
Mac Addresses, so change them), but I don't know how to address the
detection given in this thread.
Is my nice, compact, portable (not to mention powerhouse) analysis
laptop/lab about to be replaced by desks full of actual computers to do
analysis? Ugh!
Chris
| |