Re: yes, its t0rn again

[Michael Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

Just curious if anyone has turned up any more bits of the new t0rn kit and
reported them to you...  I am very interested in its ability to avoid md5
checksums.

Im guessing it simply trojans your local copy of md5sum, given its
installed in the default location.  I knew there was a good reason I built
my copy of md5sum from source and stuck it in /usr/local/bin/sec-tools/  =)

Anyway, if you have any more info, I would love to dig into it.

	-Thanks,
	  Michael Damm
	  Network Operations and
          IT Security Department
	  Access Northwest, LLC.
---
Business:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.accessnw.net/ - (509) 542-3221
Personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.symetrix.org/ - (877) 534-6247

On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, johnathan curst wrote:

> Hello Again,
> t0rn is back and seems like the author has been
> paying attention.
>
> First off the compromised machine :
> Redhat 7 (standard lpd exploit used - worm ?)
>
> Standard binaries were replaced as always, as were
> libproc.a, libproc.so.2.0.6, libproc.so and ldconfig was
> run. (Notice a Change compared to old versions ?)
>
> Another substancial Change which i picked up on
> was while setting up a honeypot, i did the usual
> md5sum binary output's saved onto non-writeable
> floppy, but the crontabed script which was checking
> for any changes to the md5sum results, was unable
> to pick up on any difference even though the hackers
> binaries replaced mine. (Any ideas ?) Hence taking
> me longer to detect the comrpomise..
>
> Only reason that i actually found out that i had been
> compromised was because the machine was
> transmitting large amount of data (stachel daemon),
> which then resulted in me ripping the machine apart
> and reinstalling the required files and finding the kit.
>
> Managed to capture the README file of the rootkit
> and a few binaries,
> http://www.geocities.com/john_curst/tk8-readme.txt if
> anyone is intrested.
>
> If anyone has the full version of this kit, I would be
> highly obliged if they could forward it to me.
>
> Regards,
> Johnathan
>