|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: WORM_MIMAIL.A Anyone have any info on what this does yet? |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: WORM_MIMAIL.A Anyone have any info on what this does yet?
- From: "Steven M. Christey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:44:15 -0400 (EDT)
 |
| |
1) As reported in Symantec's writeup of the worm, it appears that it
exploits the following vulnerability, as posted to Bugtraq by
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BUGTRAQ:20030225 Self-Executing HTML: Internet Explorer 5.5 and 6.0 Part II
URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/313174
It's not immediately clear whether this issue was addressed by
recent Microsoft bulletins. It may be an alternate attack vector
for a larger issue that was fixed by Microsoft. Thor Larholm's
site doesn't seem to mention this attack vector. Has anybody
tested the worm against a patched IE?
At least one Bugtraq post seems to conflict with an earlier post in
this thread that said that Q319182 fixes the problem:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/313355
2) Examination of the message.html file used by WORM_MIMAIL.A suggests
a heavy re-use of the exploit code as posted on http-equiv's web
site, including the "moo ha ha" alt tag and a function named
"malware." There are some differences but they appear to be
surface-level (with the exception of the malicious program itself
of course).
3) At the end of my copy of the worm's message.html, there are 3
separate calls to the executable. I haven't monitored this worm in
action, but this suggests that there may be cases where an infected
machine starts 3 processes.
Even though each SCRIPT tag redefines the same function and appears
to have the same code, it gets executed three times in my copy of
IE (based on a "hello world" modification I made to the HTML
portion of the worm's source).
- Steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 |
| |