|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Scan of TCP 552-554 |  |
- To: Dave Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: Re: Scan of TCP 552-554
- From: Rodrigo Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 21:10:19 -0300
- Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Mail-followup-to: Rodrigo Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:31:26PM -0400, Dave Paris wrote:
> Not to point out the wholly obvious or anything, but...
>
> Regardless of your response to the portscan, by the time you react it has
> already "used your link" and cost you bandwidth.
You are MOSTLY correct. But I have had cases where someone kept
portscanning me for almost a week.
--
Rodrigo Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
Attachment:
pgpoYLAOFjAId.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| |