|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [ISN] Full Disclosure: How Much Security Info Is Too Much? |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: [ISN] Full Disclosure: How Much Security Info Is Too Much?
- From: InfoSec News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 04:34:07 -0500 (CDT)
Forwarded from: Aj Effin Reznor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"InfoSec News was known to say....."
> In fact, Marc Maiffret of eEye says that they were scheduled to
> post the announcement a week earlier, but Microsoft contacted him
> to ask for more time, saying there was a problem with the patch
> and they needed another week to fix it.
>
> EEye complied. Jay Dyson correctly noted that Microsoft publicly
> thanked the company for waiting until they had prepared the patch.
On top of that, it's been established that CR II (and possibly CR I)
had a different enough structure to be considered as having NOT been
made possible by the disclosure of eEye's findings.
-aj.
-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org
To unsubscribe email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY
of the mail.
| |