RE: Still trying to decide - Implementing a PM system

["Leon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

Title: Still trying to decide - Implementing a PM system

// I work for Gravity Storm Software (Service Pack Manager 2000)

 

Richard,

 

If you are non-profit org (as I may guess from your email address) there are certain licenses (number of managed machines) that we might provide you free of charge. No strings attached. Also, no reading of vendors' material will substitute the real trying with one product or another.

 

Leon Havin

---

From: Marsh, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:10 AM
To: Patch Management Mailing List
Subject: Still trying to decide - Implementing a PM system

Several months back, I mentioned my greenness and the overwhelming feeling all the choices (regarding patch management) gave me.  I did some research and read a lot more posts.  Currently, we do all patching manually and there is no budget for a patch management solution, which means my suggestion must be cheap.  Norton's ghost seems cheap enough (we would only need 1 license) though hfnetcheck pro sounded reasonable as well.  I did see that I would need to write scripts for the Ghost to do updates, that isn't really a task I'm ready to take on.  Is hfnetcheckpro the same, will I inevitably need to learn how to script?  Still confused but learning...Thanks as always.

Sincerely,
 
Rich Marsh
 
"It is our attitude at the beginning of a difficult task which, more than
anything else, will affect its successful outcome."

William James
1842-1910
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/james/ 
 

--- 
To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]