|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: Still trying to decide - Implementing a PM system |  |
- To: "Patch Management Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: RE: Still trying to decide - Implementing a PM system
- From: "Charlene Griffith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:59:12 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: "Patch Management Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Title: Still trying to decide - Implementing a PM system
We
just bought HFNetChk. It has worked wonderfully for us. I have never
encountered any complications. I strongly recommend this
software. Its definitely great for someone who wants a cost effective, and
easy solution for patch management. I believe that you can download a trial
version on their website that allows you to play around with the software.
It only will allow you to manage ten computers, but it will let you get a feel
for the product.
Also,
please do not forget about Michael's recommendation about testing patches first,
that is one of the most important parts of Patch Management.
I also
have no affiliation with Shavlik Technologies, this is only my
opinion.
Charlene
Rich,
I
have installed HFNetChk in about 20+ environments and have never required
scripts or anything more complicated than running from the HFNetChk GUI. The
only problem I occasionally run into is related to patches not working
properly with applications on test machines. From my experience HFNetChk is by
far one of the easiest and most cost effective solutions for managing patches.
The GUI is excellent and the built-in help can get a new user up and running
quickly - its all point and click. Don't let the simplicity fool you with any
product. Always plan your roll-out strategy and policies before you actually
implement them and always remember to roll-out patches on test machines or
isolated machines first. Then perform a larger scale
roll-out.
By
the way - I have no affiliation with Shavlik Technologies so my opinions are
only biased on my personal experience :-)
Thanks,
Michael
Several months back, I mentioned my greenness and the
overwhelming feeling all the choices (regarding patch management) gave
me. I did some research and read a lot more posts. Currently, we
do all patching manually and there is no budget for a patch management
solution, which means my suggestion must be cheap. Norton's ghost
seems cheap enough (we would only need 1 license) though hfnetcheck pro
sounded reasonable as well. I did see that I would need to write
scripts for the Ghost to do updates, that isn't really a task I'm ready to
take on. Is hfnetcheckpro the same, will I inevitably need to learn
how to script? Still confused but learning...Thanks as
always.
Sincerely,
Rich Marsh
"It is our attitude at the beginning
of a difficult task which, more than
anything else,
will affect its successful outcome."
William James
1842-1910
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/james/
---
To unsubscribe send a blank email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
To
unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| |
