|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re[2]: Still trying to decide - Implementing a PM system |  |
- To: "Patch Management Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: Re[2]: Still trying to decide - Implementing a PM system
- From: David Fetrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 10:41:40 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: "Patch Management Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 |
| |
This brings up an interesting question.
Is there ANY .edu Admin on this list that has control
over professor OS/App disk images? My guess is the answer is
"no" so I would suggest no need to reply unless
the answer is "yes". I'd be willing to summarize answers
to make the replies a single post rather than a pile.
Personally I am OK with that although it makes
my job more difficult.
Edu IT tend to have a slightly different set of problems
than the corporate IT.
------------------------------------------------------------
David Fetrow
Applied Physics Lab, Univ. of Washington
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Richard Bjerregaard wrote:
> JP> BTW, our situation is more complex than most. Department policy is: each
> JP> professor buys their own computers, we can recommend, but not enforce
> JP> specific computers and almost all computers are logged on as
> JP> administrators to permit the user to modify the computer in any way. So,
> JP> no two computers are alike either in hardware or software.
>
RB> But they expect you to patch them ?
---
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| |