Virus.Org  IT Security News and Information Portal. We offer the latest IT security news, updates, product reviews, books, and articles for all you IT security professionals out there. Enter and get the best IT security information on the Internet.

 

. Welcome to the Virus.Org Mailing List Archive  
.
.


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


RE: SUS Server Hardware
.

  • To: "Patch Management Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Subject: RE: SUS Server Hardware
  • From: "KIRKPATRICK Michael -TSDC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:12:34 -0400
  • Reply-to: "Patch Management Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Thread-index: AcQuIOudzv4qWNZFRK+xRT5f24XrSQAAVYmwAAEIPRAAI3/UEA==
  • Thread-topic: SUS Server Hardware
.
 

I would strongly recommend against installing IIS services on a domain controller.
Saying that, your spare machines would be more than adequate to serve your remote client workstations
I too have the same scenario and run 2500+ client machines off of a single P4 2.4GHz machine with no
unbearable load on the machine.  The network is what I have found to be the most limiting factor when
distributing patches via SUS.


Hope it helps!




_________________________________________________
Michael P. Kirkpatrick
Senior Information Systems Analyst
         Desktop Infrastructure

New Horizon System Solutions *
    Infrastructure Management Services Group

      1315 Pickering Parkway
      Pickering, ON
      L1V 7G5

*** ** 905.837.4393 phone
*** ** 905.837.4616 fax
*** ** 905.440.6800 cell

*** ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Text Message)
             ** [EMAIL PROTECTED]

           *  a member of Capgemini



-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 4:18 PM
To: Patch Management Mailing List
Subject: SUS Server Hardware

In deploying SUS, I'd like to maximize my bandwidth and deploy a local SUS server in each of my remote offices, so those local machines get their patches from that server.  In many of these offices, this machine is a Windows 2003 DC running WINS, DNS, DHCP and file storage.  They are typically 1ghz machines or faster with 512megs of RAM.  My newer machines are 2.4ghz P4's.  There is plenty of HDD space.

Would it not be adviseable to run an SUS server on these machines, or does it not matter?  If it's not adviseable, then I'd probably not deploy a local SUS server and make them update over the WAN (not my preffered method).

For my main office, I have some spare machines, older Dell PE's in the 700mhz P3 range, 1 gig of RAM.  Is this level of machine adequate to handle 100-150 clients?



---
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
.
.
 
Copyright (c) Virus.Org 1997-2006.
All Trademarks Acknowledged.
Please view our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.