|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Snort-users] SMTP ETRN overflow attempt |  |
- To: "NO JUNK MAIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: [Snort-users] SMTP ETRN overflow attempt
- From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 16:44:25 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 |
| |
At 11:37 AM 5/6/2003 -0500, NO JUNK MAIL wrote:
Would anybody have a raw packet or more info on what the packet looks
like when it is a lagitamite attack.
The the DMail ETRN vulnerability is a classic linear buffer overflow
attack. It's going to consist of the text "ETRN" (any case) followed by 500
bytes of arbitrary data ( can be absolutely anything with no CRs), followed
by exploit code (can vary).
You might be able to narrow this up by looking for "ETRN " instead of
"ETRN", as the space will need to be in there. Also note that this rule is
coded to only look for this data at the start of a packet.
One well-known exploit
(http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/netwinroot.c)
just fills the entire "don't care" buffer space with a return address, but
the data itself (up to where the return address needs to be) can be
*anything*.
As far as I can tell from reading around, the actual size of the buffer
area prior to the return address is about 260ish bytes.
It should be noted that a DOS against this can be accomplished in under 500
bytes, so the rule will only detect an attack that is trying to gain
access, not merely crash the dmail package.
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| |