|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: Government Noses |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: RE: Government Noses
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:21:43 +0100
- Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
| |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roland Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 September 2003 16:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Government Noses
>
>
> But the most important thing to remember is that they don't
> need to be
> collecting information on everyone "just in case" (they'd be
> swamped),
> because it's easy enough for them to get the information on the
> relatively few they investigate, on an ad-hoc basis.
Hence the traffic data retention proposals?
> Their proposition
> being that they have sufficient instinct to investigate mainly people
> who turn out to be guilty.
Or at least those they sufficiently disapprove of.
And the stats on their false-positive investigation rate are not widely
published, are they?
> (Although the 99% figure pertained
> to those
> they then choose to prosecute).
Exactly so. The bit that makes them look good.
Dave
| |