|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: Government Noses |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: RE: Government Noses
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 12:14:17 +0100
- Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roland Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 September 2003 20:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Government Noses
>
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
> >>it's easy enough for them to get the information on the
> >> relatively few they investigate, on an ad-hoc basis.
> >
> >Hence the traffic data retention proposals?
>
> No they don't need traffic data, just subscriber details.
Clearly you are no better than I at detecting occasional online sarcasm.
I was pointing out that the traffic data retention is exactly the kind of
blanket coverage that you were suggesting that they do not require.
Dave.
| |