Virus.Org  IT Security News and Information Portal. We offer the latest IT security news, updates, product reviews, books, and articles for all you IT security professionals out there. Enter and get the best IT security information on the Internet.

 

. Welcome to the Virus.Org Mailing List Archive  
.
.


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Re: Disabling RFID by mains force
.

  • To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Subject: Re: Disabling RFID by mains force
  • From: "Dave Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 03:24:13 -0000
  • References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
 
Stefek Zaba wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:01:45PM -0000, Dave Howe wrote:
>>> Actually there are protocols that can count the number of items
>>> being scanned at any one point in time, even when these have the
>>> same ID. 
>> Interesting - do you have any online references?
> www.rfid.org is an obvious place to start, while the RSALabs paper
> on selective blocking gives a good description of the "individuation"
> protocol.
> The tags cooperate in a recursive-descent enumeration. Roughly, the
> reader says "first bit 0?" and all tags with first-bit-0 speak up
> with their second bit. If the reader hears responses implying the
> presence of tags with both "00" and "01" prefixes, it recurses down
> both branches of the tree; if it hears a response from only one
> subbranch, it recurses down only that branch. This way, it gets the
> uniqIDs of all responding tags in a number of steps bounded above by
> <number-of-tags-present> times <bitlength-of-a-tag-ID>,
surely that requires that they *have* a unique ID - not all the same?



 
.
.
 
Copyright (c) Virus.Org 1997-2006.
All Trademarks Acknowledged.
Please view our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.