Re: [Off topic] Another new list perhaps

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Roland Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If not, then I for one would rather keep the status quo, rather than
>> move to moderation. Anyone who finds the list volume too high can
>> simply kill threads in which they are not interested, or just delete
>> items that they are too busy to read.
>
> Keeping the status quo would probably suit many, but I can also
> understand the frustration of those who might want a crypto-only list.
>
> My suggestion was of a wide-ranging refuge should a strongly moderated
> crypto-only list emerge; but as that seems unlikely, it's probably
> moot.

Perhaps a pointer to some of the alternatives may be in order. Specifically,
reading via the mail2news gateway on www.gmane.org with a newreader that
supports scoring.  I can particularly recommend the adaptive scoring feature
in gnus.

--