|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Warning of major NHS IT overspend |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: Warning of major NHS IT overspend
- From: Adrian Midgley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 02:16:37 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
| |
On Monday 01 November 2004 09:36, Brian Beesley wrote:
> > and that locally relevant documents that require a lot
> > of storage (such as a decently readable scan of an x-ray) will be
> > retained in analogue film form at the point of generation, and only a
> > reference made in the database as to their existance.
Remember that analogue films are on the way out.
It is unlikely that a new X-ray department would be built in the UK that was
not a direct digital one - Picture Archiving - PAC systems are popular for
several reasons, but one that may not be entirely appreciated is that if you
consider the bits around a film or several films, like somewhere to walk to
get them and so on, the volume of storage required in the hospital for film
may be both larger and more expensive than the volume required for digital
images.
The detectors also (I gather) are more sensitive than the emulsion, so the
radiation dose to the population is lower. THat is counfounded by various
improvements, but seems likely in itself anyway.
Old films getting scanned in, yes, a job.
--
Adrian Midgley Open Source software is better
GP, Exeter http://www.defoam.net/
| |