|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: Warning of major NHS IT overspend |  |
- To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Subject: RE: Warning of major NHS IT overspend
- From: "Owen Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:57:24 -0000
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
| |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Beesley
> Sent: 02 November 2004 14:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Warning of major NHS IT overspend
>
>
>
> Because it may have advantages in some circumstances - superior
> resolution,
> more latitude, ...
The ultimate resolution with emulsion is the granularity of the halide. The
ultimate granularity for digital techniques is determined by the wavelength
of the radiation. Think on.
> Because it's easier to train a physician to use a light box than to use a
> computer?
I heard that the last of the diehards who can't/won't use a computer are due
to be put down quietly next year ;-)
>
> For ease of comparison with previous images from the same patient or with
> historical "type cases"?
Tsk. Never hear of split screen? Superimposition?
Owen
| |