|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Film or digital |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Film or digital
- From: Roland Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:07:15 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Beesley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
[In praise of film]
But Ilford don't seem to agree:
"Nearly half the staff at troubled photographic materials
supplier Ilford Imaging have lost their jobs.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3605614.stm
And Kodak cuts 15,000 jobs
"The firm said last week that it would stop selling traditional
film cameras in the US, Canada and Western Europe."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3419211.stm
--
Roland Perry
| |