Virus.Org  IT Security News and Information Portal. We offer the latest IT security news, updates, product reviews, books, and articles for all you IT security professionals out there. Enter and get the best IT security information on the Internet.

 

. Welcome to the Virus.Org Mailing List Archive  
.
.


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


RE: ID cards - What wasn't mentioned about the results of the consultation exercise
.

  • To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Subject: RE: ID cards - What wasn't mentioned about the results of the consultation exercise
  • From: "Owen Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:00:21 -0000
  • In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter
> Mitchell
> Sent: 02 November 2004 16:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: ID cards - What wasn't mentioned about the results of the
> consultation exercise
>
>
> Owen Lewis said:
> >
> > Could you give an example of that? E.g. Population is 75,000. Sample
> > size is 2,500. Sqrt of sample is 50. So forecast accuracy is?
>
> If the population is approximately evenly split, the sample mean will
> "probably" be within 2% of the population mean.
>
> The exact meaning of the word "probably" in this context is not
> straightforward, though.

:-)
>
> And when
> > sample is the same but the population is 750,000,000?
>
> It doesn't matter what the population size is.

That's where I suspect that reality and theory may part company. If I try to
balance a sample of 2500 from a population of 75,000 (a large town), there's
a fair chance that I can do that. Balance the same sized sample for a
population of 750,000? ..... Glad I don't have to try.


Owen



 
.
.
 
Copyright (c) Virus.Org 1997-2006.
All Trademarks Acknowledged.
Please view our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.