Virus.Org  IT Security News and Information Portal. We offer the latest IT security news, updates, product reviews, books, and articles for all you IT security professionals out there. Enter and get the best IT security information on the Internet.

 

. Welcome to the Virus.Org Mailing List Archive  
.
.


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Re: Halide emulsion vs digital. Was RE: Warning of major NHS IT overspend
.

  • To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Subject: Re: Halide emulsion vs digital. Was RE: Warning of major NHS IT overspend
  • From: Ian G Batten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:28:10 +0000
  • In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited
  • References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
 
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004, Alex Tibbles wrote:

> > for some years.  Does
> > anyone still shoot movies on 35mm stock?
> 
> AFAIK yes. You'd still struggle (ie more expensive
> than film) to find hard drives that can muster 24 *
> ~10MB frames per second, continually (mildly
> compressed images of comparable quality to 35mm), so

Accepting your claim of 240MBytes/sec --- and I don't, because you're
assuming a sequence of lightly JPEG'd frames, whereas reality says you'd
be generating a stream of differences with occasional index frames,
MPEG-stylee, unless you're shooting something where each frame is
substantially different to the adjacent frames --- then you need to ask
yourself ``what's the longest shot I need to make''?  The longest single
shots I can think of, Figgis's `Timecode' aside --- which was shot on
progressive scan DV --- would be the opening sequences of Welles' `Touch
of Evil', Altman's `The Player' and De Palma's `Snake Eye', all of them
at about ten minutes.  Commodity disk arrays can sink of the order of
60MBytes/sec, so you have a deficit of 180MBytes/sec over ten minutes.
A hundred gigabytes of RAM is hardly an insurmountable barrier.

> for high-quality footage (eg. feature films) it is
> still extensively used.

Sure.  But PS DV is now used without being foregrounded as ``looking
like video'', as it was in `Timecode'.  For example, `Lovely and
Amazing' doesn't look obviously like video (although it doesn't look
like 35mm, I'll grant you, perhaps looking more like the Super16 Figgis
shot `Leaving Las Vegas' on).  I've just looked at a list of films shot
on HDTV video
(http://www.imdb.com/SearchTechnical?PCS:HDTV%09(1080p/24)) and I note
that Rodrigez's `Once Upon a Time in Mexico' is HDTV, and that certainly
doesn't look worse than 35mm.

And before anyone says ``ah, but on the big screen...'' I almost
exclusively watch films in cinemas.

> No comment on the quality of the film. ;)

I sat a couple of seats from Euan McGregor on a flight to LA during the
filming of Star Wars.  He's very short.

ian


 
.
.
 
Copyright (c) Virus.Org 1997-2006.
All Trademarks Acknowledged.
Please view our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.