|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Warning of major NHS IT overspend |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: Warning of major NHS IT overspend
- From: Ian G Batten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:05:49 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
| |
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004, Roger Hayter wrote:
> Not entirely random, in that you cannot nominate a (?primary) DNS server
The distinction between primary and secondary is an artifact of the
software, not the protocol. The protocol supports zone distribution,
but the NS records for a zone can a primary and some secondaries, all
secondaries (as they are for ftel.co.uk: you can't get at the primary)
or all primaries (if the zone files are distributed over rsync or
something).
> for a .com or .net domain without getting someone in a hosting company
> to vouch for the suitability of the hostname and IP with a domain
> registrar.
I didn't know that. We hold ftel.co.uk on our own tag (it's one of the
(in)famous pre-Nominet names, dating back to the Salford NRS) and I can
change the NS records ad libitum with a piece of PGP signed mail.
> By saying that people in a domain hosting company are not a
> random selection of the population I am not claiming any particular
> degree of expertise or social responsibility, however.
Quite so. One reason I eventually stopped holding batten-family.org.uk
via a registrar and coughed up the 80 quid per two years it costs to
keep on FTEL's tag was because I was fed up with the antics of hosting
companies.
ian
| |