Virus.Org  IT Security News and Information Portal. We offer the latest IT security news, updates, product reviews, books, and articles for all you IT security professionals out there. Enter and get the best IT security information on the Internet.

 

. Welcome to the Virus.Org Mailing List Archive  
.
.


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Re: protection of results
.

  • To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Subject: Re: protection of results
  • From: Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:54:41 +0000
  • In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Organization: The Fool and Bladder Face-Jumping Team
  • References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
 
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:51:59 +0000 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Beesley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I wonder if the fact that electronic voting systems were in use in at
>  least some counties in at least some of the critical states in last
>  weeks US Presidential Election might be responsible for the
>  significant difference between the exit polls and the votes counted.

Maybe, but one has to allow for the tendency for people not to say that
have voted for a given candidate due to their desire not to be
identified as a supporter, this is given as one of the reasons why exit
polls are not very reliable. The UK general election of 1992 was a case
in point IIRC, or maybe it was the one before that (1988?).

I also doubt that there is any chance of the US election vote being
re-checked even if there is the information to do it.

-- 

Brian Morrison

bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk

GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html


 
.
.
 
Copyright (c) Virus.Org 1997-2006.
All Trademarks Acknowledged.
Please view our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.