|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: protection of results |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: protection of results
- From: Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:54:41 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Organization: The Fool and Bladder Face-Jumping Team
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
| |
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:51:59 +0000 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Beesley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if the fact that electronic voting systems were in use in at
> least some counties in at least some of the critical states in last
> weeks US Presidential Election might be responsible for the
> significant difference between the exit polls and the votes counted.
Maybe, but one has to allow for the tendency for people not to say that
have voted for a given candidate due to their desire not to be
identified as a supporter, this is given as one of the reasons why exit
polls are not very reliable. The UK general election of 1992 was a case
in point IIRC, or maybe it was the one before that (1988?).
I also doubt that there is any chance of the US election vote being
re-checked even if there is the information to do it.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
| |