|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: DNS primer |  |
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: DNS primer
- From: Philip Rowlands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:41:16 +0000 (GMT)
- In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |
| |
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Dave Howe wrote:
>linuxops.net. 38400 IN SOA ns1.linuxops.net. hostmaster.linuxops.net. (
> 2004091902 ; Serial
> 28800 ; Refresh (8 hours)
> 7200 ; Retry (2 hours)
> 604800 ; ExpTTLire (7 days)
> 86400 ) ; TTL (24 hours)
>
> > 86400 ) ; TTL (24 hours)
>record expiry for caches
I wish this comment "TTL" would vanish from the default zonefiles of the
world... The fifth field in SOA is the negative-cache TTL; the time that
a lookup failure can be remembered and replayed without recourse to an
authoritative server.
See RFC2308, and please test against your favourite caching server.
google.com is a good test-case - ncache TTL is set to 60 seconds.
Cheers,
Phil
| |