![]() |
|
|
|
Philip Rowlands wrote: While 2308 is an excellent idea and addresses issues in the overloading of that field to mean three things (one of which has never been implimented to my knowledge - the *minimum* TTL) AFAIK it is not yet accepted as part of the standard - so DNS servers are still free to ignore it if they wish. If this is no longer true let me know - I will be delighted to hear it :)I wish this comment "TTL" would vanish from the default zonefiles of the world... The fifth field in SOA is the negative-cache TTL; the time that a lookup failure can be remembered and replayed without recourse to an authoritative server. See RFC2308, and please test against your favourite caching server. google.com is a good test-case - ncache TTL is set to 60 seconds.
|