Virus.Org  IT Security News and Information Portal. We offer the latest IT security news, updates, product reviews, books, and articles for all you IT security professionals out there. Enter and get the best IT security information on the Internet.

 

. Welcome to the Virus.Org Mailing List Archive  
.
.


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Re: DNS primer
.

  • To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Subject: Re: DNS primer
  • From: Dave Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:41:25 +0000
  • In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
 
Philip Rowlands wrote:
I wish this comment "TTL" would vanish from the default zonefiles of the
world... The fifth field in SOA is the negative-cache TTL; the time that
a lookup failure can be remembered and replayed without recourse to an
authoritative server.
See RFC2308, and please test against your favourite caching server.
google.com is a good test-case - ncache TTL is set to 60 seconds.
While 2308 is an excellent idea and addresses issues in the overloading of that field to mean three things (one of which has never been implimented to my knowledge - the *minimum* TTL) AFAIK it is not yet accepted as part of the standard - so DNS servers are still free to ignore it if they wish. If this is no longer true let me know - I will be delighted to hear it :)


 
.
.
 
Copyright (c) Virus.Org 1997-2006.
All Trademarks Acknowledged.
Please view our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.